quotes


0

“If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare, and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare, they may take the care of religion into their own hands; they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish and pay them out of their public treasury; they may take into their own hands the education of children, establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union; they may assume the provision of the poor; they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads; in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation down to the most minute object of police, would be thrown under the power of Congress. … Were the power of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for, it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature of the limited Government established by the people of America.” – James Madison1


  1. Mr. James Madison, quoted in “Rethinking Power We Give Government: Part 2 of 2″, National Catholic Register Blogs. Viewed 2010-02-04. http://www.ncregister.com/blog/rethinking_the_power_we_give_government_part_2_of_2 

0

“Catholic teaching on subsidiarity and the American tradition of federalism – to say nothing of simple realism about what happens when large state bureaucracies get extensive power – should here join hands in proper wariness about the unintended consequences of efforts to do good.” – Robert Royal1


  1. Mr. Robert Royal. “The U.S. Bishops on Health Care” The Catholic Thing. 2009-07-23 http://www.thecatholicthing.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1946&Itemid=2 

0

“Given his selfish nature, man must internalize some reason to behave in pro-social ways. That fact that he falls short of these values does not mean he is a hypocrite. The one who does not even believe what he says is the hypocrite. The one who believes what he says and falls short is merely human.” – Dr. Mike Adams1


  1. Dr. Mike Adams. “The Nature of Conservatism” Townhall.com 2009-05-18 viewed 2009-05-31. http://townhall.com/columnists/MikeAdams/2009/05/18/the_nature_of_conservatism 

0

The quote1 actually says

  • science != consensus
  • politics == consensus
  • science == ∃ X such that ((X == investigator) && (X == “correct”); where (”correct” == “results are verifiable in reference to the real world”))

The problem is that skepticism does not reign throughout much of science. Rather, dogmatism reigns. Anyone who dissents is silenced. If the environment we have today existed, Einstein would not have been able to publish, he upset too many careers. But back then the science journals were not as tightly controlled as they are now, and it was more possible then for a radical idea to get published.

It is then asked, “what does it mean to say in reference to the real world.”2 A valid question. What is meant here is that results have to bear out, taking relativity for an example again, we can see that the data fits better than Newtonian physics. However, Global Warming doesn’t account for a great deal of the data out there. Relativity fits the real world. Global warming is questionable at best.


  1. Mr. Luke Schierer. “Quote of the Day” Random Unfinished Thoughts. 2008-11-14 http://www.schierer.org/~luke/log/20081114-0722/quote-of-the-day-35 

  2. “damian792″. “Ramblings” The Clydesdale Chronicles 2008-11-14 http://damian792.livejournal.com/100114.html 

1

“The work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.” – Michael Crichton1


  1. Michael Crichton. “Aliens Cause Global Warming” reprinted in Wall Street Journal, November 7, 2008. Quote seen on “Evolution News & Views” blog post “Is There a “Consensus” in Science? Remembering the Late Michael Crichton” by Mr. Casey Luskin http://www.evolutionnews.org/2008/11/is_there_a_consensus_in_scienc.html 2008-11-14. 

0

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasure. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s great civilizations has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through the following sequence: from bondage to spiritual faith, from spiritual faith to great courage, from courage to liberty, from liberty to abundance, from abundance to selfishness, from selfishness to complacency, from complacency to apathy, from apathy to dependency, from dependency back to bondage.” – Alexander Tyler (A Scottish professor)1


  1. Quote found in “The Financial Crisis Congress Doesn’t Want You to Understand” by Mrs. Candice Watters in The Line. 2008-09-25. http://www.boundlessline.org/2008/09/the-financial-c.html 

0

No endorsement of any single issue qualifies a person to hold public office. Being pro-life does not make a person a good governor, mayor, or president. But there are numerous single issues that disqualify a person from public office. For example, any candidate who endorsed bribery as a form of government efficiency would be disqualified, no matter what his party or platform was. Or a person who endorsed corporate fraud (say under $50 million) would be disqualified no matter what else he endorsed. Or a person who said that no black people could hold office—on that single issue alone he would be unfit for office. Or a person who said that rape is only a misdemeanor—that single issue would end his political career. These examples could go on and on. Everybody knows a single issue that for them would disqualify a candidate for office.1


  1. Mr. John Piper. “One-Issue Politics, One-Issue Marriage, and the Humane Society” Desiring God. 1995-01-01 http://www.desiringgod.org/ResourceLibrary/Articles/ByDate/1995/1524_OneIssue_Politics_OneIssue_Marriage_and_the_Humane_Society/ 

0

“How can I explain these things, so obvious, and yet so invisible to those who think that “it’s all about sex”? Difference of sex makes a difference, but what kind? Perhaps I should leave it at this: To a man, women seem to glow in more hues than men do. In different ones too. The spectrum is wider, the world has more color, because of their presence in it, especially the presence of the beloved. Of course there are certain things which a normal man prefers to do with other men, like playing tackle football. Yet the very light and air seem to change when a woman leaves the room, and all men know it. Obviously this fact is connected with her bodily presence, but it isn’t about imagining her naked.” – J. Budziszewski aka Professor Theophilus1

An excellent quote by one of the better Focus on the Family authors.


  1. J. . Budziszewski aka Professor Theophilus. “Ask Theophilus: Advice to the Lustlorn” 2008-03-06 http://www.trueu.org/Academics/ProfsOffice/askTheo/A000000876.cfm#fn2 

0

“The fact that there is a great divide between what education ought to be and what it actually is suggests that there is someone who is benefiting from the status quo.” – Ms. Melinda Selmys1


  1. Ms. Melinda Selmys. “The Cluelessness Crisis Part 1: The 5 Essentials of Education” The National Catholic Registrar. January 27- February 2, 2008 Issue. 2008-01-25 http://ncregister.com/site/article/7852/ A subscription may be required to view this article online. 

0

“He wants them to learn to walk and must therefore take away His hand; and if only the will to walk is really there He is pleased even with their stumbles. Do not be deceived, Wormwood. Our cause is never more in danger than when a human, no longer desiring, but still intending, to do our Enemy’s will, looks round upon a universe from which every trace of Him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been forsaken, and still obeys.” – C. S. Lewis, _The Screwtape Letters_

Next Page »