Archive for October 10th, 2005

0

Apparently we have been neglecting to fully use the tools Einstein gave us in the form of General Relativity and Special Relativity. In our quest for quantum mechanics, we have overlooked the fact that General Relativity can explain away the need for dark matter in at least some situations.[1] Note the speculation on why it took so long to realize this is mine. The article merely talks about the realization itself.

  1. Mr.(Dr.?) Steve Reucroft and Mr.(Dr.?) John Swain, Northeastern University. “General relativity versus exotic dark matter” Physicswatch viewed 2005-10-10. http://www.cerncourier.com/main/article/45/8/8

0

This[1] Catholic News Agency report mirrors some things Andrius told me.

  1. Catholic News Agency. “Uruguayan bishop says secularization main obstacle to spread of the gospel” Catholic News Agency (online) 2005-10-10. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=5107

0

“Faith cannot be reduced to a private sentiment, which, perhaps, is hidden when it becomes something uncomfortable; rather, it implies coherence and witness in the public realm in favor of man, justice and truth.” —Pope Benedict XVI

0

Mr. Steinar H. Gunderson of Debian posted about an odd “reality” television show he recently became hooked on.[1] Most of it is devoid of serious interest, but the following factoid caught my eye.

I think the concept is worth deliberating a bit on because it highlights a few interesting themes. For one, it has put some focus on people falling outside the school system’s idea of physical activity. At least here in Norway, the only subject you really can’t afford to suck at is PE — if you’re bad at maths or English or whatever, that’s not really half as bad as not being able to kick a football straight. (It’s also interestingly about the only subject where it’s okay to be good — this does of course vary from school to school, but there are plenty of places where it’s just not accepted to do well in maths or whatnot.)[1]

When I bring up the idea of self discrimination as an explanation for poverty here, I receive odd looks, and meet disbelief. Somewhat less commonly, my theory is accepted, but the blame is shifted back to those of European decent by stating that such an attitude could only have come about from years of oppression. I offer this tidbit, written by someone whose culture has no recent history of enslavement, as a counter example. Clearly those who do not resist the attitude described above will not be able to compete in a free market/capitalistic society with as high a success rate as those who can resist said attitude. Education is a critical part of success in a free market society, and to willfully bias one’s peer group against it must necessarily lead to decreased standard of living across the peer group. Is this reflective of Europe as a whole, it would explain why the average standard of living is not so high as ours, something I have alluded to before.

  1. Mr. Steinar H. Gunderson. “Heia Tufte!” Steinar H. Gunderson blog 2005-10-08. http://blog.sesse.net/blog/tech/2005-10-08-01-30_heia_tufte.html

0

The State Department appears to have found the guts to stop funding a United Nations program that effectively supports China’s one child policies.[1] Surprisingly, this is not the first year they have done so. Less surprisingly, but incredibly depressingly, this step is apparently necessary because no one else will recognize the fact that China is killing babies, and interfering with the choices that married couples make left and right.

  1. TheFactIs.org. “US Refuses to Fund UNFPA for the Fourth Consecutive Year” Friday Fax Volume 8, Number 42 2005-10-07. http://www.thefactis.org/default.aspx?control=ArticleMaster&aid=243&authid=11